• Business
  • Finance
  • Banking
  • Education
  • General
  • Law
  • Science
  • IT
  • English

Key Differences

Know the Differences & Comparisons

Difference Between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

inductve vs deductive reasoningThe process of thinking about something, in a rational manner, so as to draw valid conclusions, is known as Reasoning. It is a daily activity that we use to make decisions, which involves the construction of thoughts and converting them into a proposition to give reasons on why we have opted for a particular alternative over the other.Reasoning (logic) can take two forms – inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning. The inductive reasoning follows a particular flow or behaviour so as to make inferences

Conversely, deductive reasoning uses available information, facts or premises to arrive at a conclusion. These two logics are exactly opposite to each other. Still, they are often juxtaposed due to lack of adequate information. In this article, we are going to tell you the basic differences between inductive and deductive reasoning, which will help you to understand them better.

Content: Inductive Reasoning Vs Deductive Reasoning

  1. Comparison Chart
  2. Definition
  3. Key Differences
  4. Video
  5. Conclusion

Comparison Chart

Basis for ComparisonInductive ReasoningDeductive Reasoning
MeaningInductive Reasoning connotes the argument in which the premises give reasons in support of the probable truth of the conjecture.Deductive reasoning is the fundamental form of valid reasoning, wherein the premises give guarantee of the truth of conjecture.
ApproachBottom-up approachTop-down approach
Starting pointConclusionPremises
Based onPatterns or trendFacts, truths and rules
ProcessObservation > Pattern > Tentative Hypothesis > TheoryTheory > Hypothesis > Observation > Confirmation
ArgumentMay or may not be strong.May or may not be valid.
StructureGoes from specific to generalGoes from general to specific
Draws inferences withProbabilityCertainity

Definition of Inductive Reasoning

In research, inductive reasoning alludes to the logical process, in which specific instances or situations are observed or analysed to establish general principles. In this process, the multiple propositions are believed to provide strong evidence, for the truth of the conclusion. It is used to develop an understanding, on the basis of observing regularities, to ascertain how something works.

These are uncertain arguments; that describes the extent to which the conclusions drawn on the basis of premises, are credible.

In inductive reasoning, there are certain possibilities that the conclusion drawn can be false, even if the all the assumptions are true. The reasoning vests on experience and observations that support the apparent truth of the conclusion. Further, the argument can be strong or weak, as it only describes the likelihood of the inference, to be true.

Definition of Deductive Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning means a form of logic in which specific inferences are drawn from multiple premises (general statements). It establishes the relationship between the proposition and conclusion. When all the proposed statements are true, then the rules of deduction are applied and the result obtained is inevitably true.

Deductive logic is based on the fundamental law of reasoning, i.e. if X then Y. It implies the direct application of available information or facts, to come up with new information or facts. In this, the researcher takes into account a theory and generates a hypothesis, which can be tested, after that the observation are recorded, which leads to particular data, which is nothing but the confirmation of validity.

Key Differences Between Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

The points provided below, clarifies the difference between inductive and deductive reasoning in detail:

  1. The argument in which the premises give reasons in support of the probable truth of the conjecture is inductive reasoning. The elementary form of valid reasoning, wherein the proposition provide the guarantee of the truth of conjecture, is deductive reasoning.
  2. While inductive reasoning uses the bottom-up approach, deductive reasoning uses a top-down approach.
  3. The initial point of inductive reasoning is the conclusion. On the other hand, deductive reasoning starts with premises.
  4. The basis of inductive reasoning is behaviour or pattern. Conversely, deductive reasoning depends on facts and rules.
  5. Inductive reasoning begins with a small observation, that determines the pattern and develops a theory by working on related issues and establish the hypothesis. In contrast, deductive reasoning begins with a general statement, i.e. theory which is turned to the hypothesis, and then some evidence or observations are examined to reach the final conclusion.
  6. In inductive reasoning, the argument supporting the conclusion, may or may not be strong. On the contrary, in deductive reasoning, the argument can be proved valid or invalid.
  7. Inductive reasoning moves from specific to general. Unlike, deductive reasoning moves from general to particular.
  8. In inductive reasoning, the inferences drawn are probabilistic. As opposed, in deductive reasoning, the generalisation made are necessarily true, if the premises are correct.

Video: Inductive Vs Deductive Reasoning

Conclusion

To sum up, inductive and deductive reasoning are the two kinds of logic, which are used in the field of research to develop the hypothesis, so as to arrive at a conclusion, on the basis of information, which is believed to be true. Inductive reasoning considers events for making the generalization. In contrast, deductive reasoning takes general statements as a base to arrive at an particular conclusion.

You Might Also Like:

Difference Between Null and Alternative Hypothesis Difference Between Hypothesis and Prediction hypothesis vs theoryDifference Between Hypothesis and Theory Assume Vs PresumeDifference Between Assume and Presume subjective vs objectiveDifference Between Objective and Subjective fact vs opinionDifference Between Fact and Opinion

Comments

  1. matt says

    December 5, 2018 at 4:33 pm

    Explained with real clarity and concision. The best presented, most succinct, differentiation between these two divergent forms of logic/reasoning that I have read. A well deserved pat on the back to the author and due credit to any earlier authors from whom this work was derived.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Top 5 Differences

  • Difference Between PERT and CPM
  • Difference Between Micro and Macro Economics
  • Difference Between Developed Countries and Developing Countries
  • Difference Between Management and Administration
  • Difference Between Qualitative and Quantitative Research



New Additions

  • Difference Between Deforestation, Reforestation and Afforestation
  • Difference Between Race and Ethnicity
  • Difference Between Customer Service and Customer Experience
  • Difference Between Human Capital and Human Development
  • Difference Between Systems Approach and Contingency Approach
  • Difference Between Industrial Relations and Employee Relations
  • Difference Between Introduction and Executive Summary
  • Difference Between Programmed and Non-programmed Decisions
  • Difference Between Depreciation and Devaluation of Currency
  • Difference Between Consumer Market and Business Market

Categories

  • Banking
  • Business
  • Education
  • English
  • Finance
  • General
  • IT
  • Law
  • Science
fb-follow youtube follow

Copyright © 2025 · Key Differences · Contact Us · About Us · Privacy